Transition paths for Extended Producer Responsibility

This position paper contains an analysis of the main strengths and limitations of the way Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is currently organized in the Netherlands. Based on this analysis, three Transition Paths for improving EPR for the circular economy are presented:

  1. Optimizing EPR as an instrument for post-use circularity. Collection and recycling objectives should be balanced with the promotion of product life extension (according to the R hierarchy through repair, refurbishment, and remanufacturing). The companies involved in this should be formally incorporated into the EPR in a new “circular value chain management organization”
  2. Redesigning EPR as an instrument for the transition to a circular economy. Transition Path 2 builds on Transition Path 1 and focuses on goals and financial mechanisms for sustainable and circular product design.
  3. More than EPR: how other instruments can support EPR and the CE. Under this transition path, the authors provide recommendations for additional options to support the EPR instrument. This concerns better regulation for eco-design and Design for Sustainability, possibilities for environmental impact, and the essential role of consumers and municipalities.

Download PDF

Share this publication

Other relevant publications

The role of extended producer pesponsibility (EPR) in the energy transition

Analysis of the implementation of EPR for batteries in electric vehicles, solar panels, and wind turbines

Potential for reuse coffee machines

Research into the possibilities for reusing coffee machines. This study examined ease of assembly and disassembly, the technical properties of components, costs, and market potential.

Report collection for reuse at recycling centers

This report analyzes pilot projects in the municipalities of Amersfoort and Zwolle aimed at promoting the reuse of electrical appliances through recycling centers.

×